Protect Your Practice, Reputation, and Career

If one of your patients has filed a complaint to the College of Dental Technologists of Ontario (“CDTO”), you need the assistance of a skilled and experienced professional discipline lawyer. ALF defends dental technologists in proceedings at the CDTO. Being the subject of a patient complaint and facing allegations of professional misconduct can be an incredibly stressful and time-consuming experience. Entrusting ALF with your CDTO case means that you will have a trusted advocate by your side throughout the complaints and discipline process. We understand how damaging patient complaints and professional misconduct allegations can be to your reputation and financial stability. Our goal is to ensure that the complaint is found to be without merit, and allegations of professional misconduct are dismissed. Our lawyers work tirelessly, creatively, and relentlessly to protect your livelihood, and we have a network of expert witnesses who collaborate with us to help navigate the CDTO process.

How Can We Assist You?

Investigations and Audits by the College

ALF’s dental technologist defense lawyers have vast expertise in guiding dental technologists through the investigatory stages of a CDTO complaint and assisting with CDTO audits. The earlier you seek expert legal advice, the better your chances of preserving your reputation, license, and livelihood. During an audit, we will work with you to ensure you are thoroughly prepared. In an investigation, we will ensure all relevant information that demonstrates your competence and integrity is provided to the investigator, giving the College the tools it needs to dismiss any complaints.

ICRC Proceedings

The Inquiries, Complaints, and Reports Committee (ICRC) screens complaints against dental technologists and may refer the case to the discipline committee for hearings on professional misconduct or incapacity. Alternatively, the ICRC may issue a caution, require attendance at a specialized continuing education program (SCERP), or take other actions deemed appropriate.

Consulting a lawyer at this stage is essential. Even if the ICRC does not refer the complaint to the discipline committee, cautions and SCERPs result in mandatory publication of the ICRC’s decision on the CDTO’s online register, which can damage your reputation. Dental technologists have the opportunity to make written submissions to the ICRC, and ALF’s defence lawyers specialize in crafting clear, persuasive submissions to convince the ICRC to dismiss the complaint early. Acting promptly can save your time, reputation, and finances.

Discipline Committee Hearings

If the case advances to a hearing before the Discipline Committee, you’ll need experienced legal representation. Our team has decades of expertise in managing witness testimony, presenting evidence, and conducting cross-examinations in tribunals and courtrooms across Ontario.

Effective cross-examination of the prosecution’s witnesses is key to obtaining the dismissal of professional misconduct charges. Success in these hearings depends on meticulous preparation, skillful questioning, and the ability to adapt to witness answers. ALF’s dental technologist defense lawyers bring these essential skills to your defense.

HPARB Appeals

If the ICRC has issued an unfair or unreasonable decision, you have the right to appeal the outcome to the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB). These appeals involve a careful examination of the ICRC's record, drafting legal arguments, and may include oral submissions before a panel.

Our dental technologist defense lawyers bring their extensive experience to bear on your case. We will scrutinize the record of proceedings to develop strong arguments for your appeal. With our trial and appellate experience, we are well-equipped to find errors in the record and present powerful arguments in your favor.

Successful appeals rely heavily on written advocacy—and ALF’s written submissions are polished, clear, and persuasive. Our lawyers have years of experience in preparing legal submissions for various Ontario tribunals and courts, including the Divisional Court, Court of Appeal for Ontario, and the Supreme Court of Canada. When it comes time to present your case, we’ll be fully prepared to argue your appeal effectively.

Judicial Review at the Divisional Court

If HPARB or the Discipline Committee upholds an unfavorable decision, a dental technologist may seek judicial review at the Divisional Court of Ontario. Judicial reviews involve a thorough examination of the record of proceedings, preparation of legal arguments, and oral arguments before a panel of Ontario Superior Court judges. ALF’s dental technologist defence lawyers have experience arguing cases before the Divisional Court and will work diligently to protect your reputation, professional license, and financial future.

Why Choose ALF?

• Proven Results: We have a strong track record of achieving favorable outcomes for regulated professionals.

• Respected Advocacy: Our written and oral advocacy is highly regarded across tribunals and courts.

• Competitive Fees: We provide top-tier representation at reasonable rates.

Contact Us Today

If you are a dental technologist facing a complaint, it's in your best interest to retain an experienced dental technologist defense lawyer immediately. ALF can help you avoid serious consequences, such as reputational damage and financial loss.

Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation, either in person, by phone, or virtually. Trust the ALF team of highly skilled dental technologist defense lawyers with a proven track record of success.